Legal Opinion

J.M. v. SUMMIT CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00159Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY J.M. and E.M., individually and o/b/o C.M., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 19-00159 (KM) (ESK) v. OPINION SUMMIT CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: J.M. and E.M. (“Parents”) are the parents of C.M., who was an elementary-school student when the events here began. The Parents sought to have C.M. classified as disabled and thus entitled to a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) based on an individualized education plan (“IEP”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”),

20 U.S.C. § 1400

et seq.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Fry v. Napoleon Community SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API