Legal Opinion

Rivenbark v. Shell Union Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against defendants for alleged injury to him by defendants, in keeping and maintaining at a gasoline or filling station, operated by defendants in Wilmington, N. C., a slick and dangerous place for customers to walk on, by allowing gasoline, oils and greases to drip and spill on the floor and approach to the filling station. Plaintiff alleged that he was seriously injured, without fault on his part, by defendants’ negligence in not using due care to keep a safe place to walk on. The defendants Farrow in their answer say that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Biggins v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Duke Ex Rel. Duke v. Crippled Children's Commission, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Bell v. Murchison National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Dunlap v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cummings v. WitthausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Gibbs v. . RussSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Cloninger v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Marks v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. H. L. Coble Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API