Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

COLEMAN, J.

The narrow issue raised in this workers’ compensation case is whether an improper use of a transcript of a prior workers’ compensation proceeding was so prejudicial that a redetermination of the merits of the claims should be required. The Appellate Division concluded that a reversal and remand are required. We granted certification, 144 N.J. 585, 677 A.2d 758 (1996). We now reverse and hold that the error was harmless.

*159I

In June 1990, petitioner Toby Easton Reinhart filed a workers’ compensation petition -alleging that a work-related accident…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Serrano v. UNDERGROUND UTIL. CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Gonzalez v. SilverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. State v. TownsendNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. DeBartolomeis v. Bd. of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API