Legal Opinion

Menaker v. Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1936No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in trespass brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been suffered by the minor plaintiff as the result of the ingestion of ice cream containing a deleterious foreign substance, and this appeal is from the refusal of the court below to take off a compulsory nonsuit. The action belongs to that class of cases where a claim is made against a manufacturer for impure food purchased from a retail dealer. We are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to entitle the plaintiffs to have their case submitted to a jury.

For the purposes of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. ZELINSKY Et Ux. v. ChimicsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Bilk v. Abbotts Dairies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Kutner v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Smith v. Coca Cola Bot. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API