Legal Opinion

Smith v. Coca Cola Bot. Co. of Pa.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1943No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff recovered a verdict in an action of trespass for injuries alleged to have resulted from drinking coca cola in which there was the remains of a spider. The trial judge subsequently sustained defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. holding that the evidence did not show that the dead spider (1) rendered the coca cola injurious; or (2) that it caused plaintiff’s illness. We are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to support a verdict.

The plaintiff, a steel worker 47 years of age, at about 6:30 p.m. of the evening of May 25, 1938, purchased a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Madden Et Ux. v. Great A. P. Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drew v. LaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Campbell v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Jastrzembski v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Drew v. LaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API