Legal Opinion

State v. Brainard

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 5, 1998No. 07-96-0231-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES L. REYNOLDS, Senior Justice (Retired).

The State of Texas and its General Land Office perfected this appeal to challenge a judgment by which the trial court summarily determined the boundaries of the Canadian River abutting certain described real properties located in Hutchinson and Roberts Counties and, accepting a jury verdict, assessed attorney’s and surveyor’s fees against the General Land Office. Because unresolved material fact issues preclude the summary adjudication, and the award of fees was not authorized, we will reverse and remand in part and reverse and render in part.

Begin…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lowe v. Texas Tech UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hosner v. DeYoungTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Mount Pleasant Independent School District v. Estate of Lindburg Ex Rel. LindburgTexas Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Osbourn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. State v. Riemer, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Board of Trustees v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  5. Riemer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API