Legal Opinion
State v. Nath
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 2005No. 30002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Arvind Nath appeals the district court’s order denying Nath’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea to attempted custody interference. Nath contends that his guilty plea was invalid because he was coerced into pleading guilty in light of the circumstances he was facing at the time he entered his plea. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Nath and his wife, Paige, have a daughter who was born in 1987. Paige’s relatives, the Yosts, cared for the child almost from her birth. In 1995, the Yosts obtained legal custody of the child and moved to Boise. In 1996, Nath was charged with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- William J. Politte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mata v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. NathIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HanslovanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. StoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HanslovanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008