Legal Opinion

Lavond A. Hill v. Corrections Officer Vicklund

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00008Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAVOND A. HILL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-008 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines Corrections Officer VICKLUND, ) Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Presently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53) filed by the sole remaining Defendant in this case, Corrections Officer Vicklund (“Vicklund”).’ Vicklund seeks to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Lavond A. Hill’s (“Hill”) Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30). Vicklund asserts that Hill failed to exhaust his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Bryan Santini v. Joseph FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API