Neuweiler v. Kauer
Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BAUMANN, J.
The Director of Highways intends to designate as a limited access thoroughfare, several miles of State Route 20 between Fremont and Clyde. The plaintiffs, as affected property owners, seek to enjoin the contemplated action. The facts have been stipulated, leaving to the court for decision, the *538constitutionality and practical application of this portion of the highway act.
Sec. 1178-21 GC is in question. It provides as follows:
“Sec. 1178-21 GC. ‘Limited access highways’ and ‘freeways’ may be established, constructed, vacated, etc.; service highways; definitions.
“Sec.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
- Lakewood v. ThormyerCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1958
- State, Ex Rel. Eichenberger v. NeffOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.