Legal Opinion

Grimes v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 12, 2018No. 73, 2017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRAYNOR, Justice:

If a defendant is convicted by a jury of one offense, but acquitted-in the same verdict-of a lesser-included offense, and the conviction on the greater offense is vacated on appeal, does the acquittal on the lesser offense prevent the State, under the Double Jeopardy Clause, from retrying the defendant for the greater offense? We conclude that it does not.

Russell Grimes was accused of participating in a bank robbery. He was indicted for first-degree robbery, aggravated menacing, and other related charges. At trial, the jury convicted him of first-degree robbery, but acquitted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021
  2. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  3. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  4. Grimes v. State Of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
  5. State v. GrimesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API