Legal Opinion
Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 11, 2010No. 2009-1102, 2009-1118PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Concurring opinion filed by Chief Judge RADER.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. (“AMC”) brought an action against Rome Fastener Corp., Rome Fastener Sales Corp., Romag Fasteners Inc., and Rings Wire, Inc. (collectively “Romag”) for allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,572,773 (the “'773 patent”). After AMC finished presenting its case in chief, the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York (the “district court”) granted Romag’s Rule 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). The district court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gollomp v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Rovalma, S.A. v. Bohler-Edelstahl Gmbh & Co. KgCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.