Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Mt. Hood Meadows, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 1997No. 9603-02414; CA A93717PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the entry of summary judgment in an action for negligence against the defendant ski resort. The trial court determined that plaintiffs claims were barred by a release that she had executed, as part of her season pass application, and particularly rejected plaintiffs contention that the release was unenforceable as violating public policy. We conclude that enforcement of the release against plaintiff in the circumstances of this case would not offend public policy. Accordingly, we affirm.

The material facts are, for purposes of this appeal, undisputed. Defendant Mt. Hood…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Bliss v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Milligan Ex Rel. Milligan v. Big Valley Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. K-Lines, Inc. v. Roberts Motor CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Mann v. WetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steele v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oregon, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Broadley v. Mashpee Neck Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Brough v. Hidden Valley, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Mayfly Group, Inc. v. RuizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API