Legal Opinion

Euphrem Manirakiza v. Department of Health and Human Services

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 23, 2018No. Docket: Ken-17-119PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Euphrem Manirakiza appeals from the judgment entered by the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Murphy, J.) upholding the final agency decision of the Department of Health and Human Services denying Manirakiza’s application for food supplement benefits. 1 Because we conclude that the temporal and fiscal limitations contained in P.L. 2013, ch. 368, § 00-14 apply only to the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013, June 30, 2014, and June 30, 2015, and not beyond June 30, 2015, we vacate the Superior Court’s judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following undisputed facts are taken from the hearing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Wong v. HawkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Lorraine Scamman v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Somerset County v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Brown v. Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Children of Nicole M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  2. Fair Elections Portland, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  3. In re Children of Shirley T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  4. Stephen Doane v. Department of Health and Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  5. Charles W. Palian v. Department of Health and Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API