State v. Ferguson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
I
At issue in the first instance is whether the prosecutor’s comment in closing argument that the state’s evidence is “uncontradicted” is a comment on the accused’s failure to take the stand and consequently a violation of the accused’s right against self-incrimination.
During closing argument, the prosecutor made several remarks which appellee characterizes as impermissible references to his failure to testify. Specifically, the record reveals the remarks were as follows:
“Force, ladies and gentlemen. This was not a consensual affair. I believe the evidence is quite clear on that. We have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DePewOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.