Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1983No. 82-441PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

I

At issue in the first instance is whether the prosecutor’s comment in closing argument that the state’s evidence is “uncontradicted” is a comment on the accused’s failure to take the stand and consequently a violation of the accused’s right against self-incrimination.

During closing argument, the prosecutor made several remarks which appellee characterizes as impermissible references to his failure to testify. Specifically, the record reveals the remarks were as follows:

“Force, ladies and gentlemen. This was not a consensual affair. I believe the evidence is quite clear on that. We have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DePewOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API