Legal Opinion

Myer v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 2008No. 15, Sept. Term, 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this criminal case involving sexual abuse to a minor, we must decide if the trial court abused its discretion when it did not allow the defendant to recall the child-witness for additional cross-examination after the court admitted into evidence a videotaped interview between a social worker and the child-witness after the child-witness had testified. We shall hold that the trial court abused its discretion in denying petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine the child-witness after the video-tape had been admitted into evidence.

I

Robert Lee Myer, petitioner, was indicted in the Circuit…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Devincentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API