Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Ludlum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1901No. 12,259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J. :

The original petition in this action, among other things, contained the following allegations :

“That about the 8d day of April, 1891, fire was communicated from one of the defendant’s engines to the grass growing along, upon and near to the track of the said railway company, and that the same ran over, upon and through the premises of the said plaintiff adjoining the land on which the said fire was put out by the said company’s engine.”
“That the said fire escaped from the said engine and was communicated to the said grass on account of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MoffattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Clark v. EllithorpCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manhattan Oil Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. Coffeyville Mining & Gas Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Alliance Cooperative Insurance v. CorbettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SweetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API