Legal Opinion
Morton v. Laesch
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 1, 1912No. 6510PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from. Clear Creek District Court.—Hon. Fror Ashbaugh, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Mh Justice'Gabbert
delivered the opinion of the court:
■ :’:::The parties to this appeal are joint owners (each an undivided one-half) of the Elida lode mining claim. Mrs. Laesch is the owner of, or interested in, adjoining Claims. Mr. Morton owns a group in the vicinity of the Elida, known as the Jo Reynolds. At the time he' became interested' in the Elida, a tunnel had been run on that claim a distance of about 324 feet. He desired to work the Jo Reynolds group through the Elida, and claims to have made a parol agreement with Mrs. Laesch to the effect that he would repair the old workings,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Ritchey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- De Camp v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Murphy v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hed v. PullaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953