Legal Opinion
United States v. 9844 S. Titan Court, Unit 9, Littleton
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 27, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-F-1365PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Cross Motions For Summary Judgment. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331. The litigants have fully briefed the matter. For the reasons stated below, the United States’ Motion For Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Claimant Frances May’s Motion For Summary Judgment is DENIED.
I. Background 1
This is a civil forfeiture action in rem brought to enforce the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 881. On July 8, 1992, the United States filed its Verified Complaint In Rem…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency. Appeal of Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ZiepfelOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Araya v. KeletaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States v. One 1990 Ford Ranger TruckDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- United States v. One Parcel Property Located at Lot 85, Country RidgeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Real Property & Appurtenances Thereto Known as 143-147 East 23rd StreetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.