Legal Opinion

Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1969No. 38-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner George Willi with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57(a). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on July 8, 1968. Plaintiff did not except to the commissioner’s recommended conclusion of law but did except to certain of his findings and requested additional findings. Defendant disagreed with some of the commissioner’s legal conclusions, requested that the court adopt the findings made by the commissioner and requested additional findings…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Angus McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Jones v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1958
  4. Cory Corp. v. SauberSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. People's Outfitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arthur C. Schmid, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  2. Arthur C. Schmid, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Warrior Coal Mining Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API