Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Strickland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 27, 2007No. 26375Published

1Opinion of the Court

375 S.C. 76 (2007)

650 S.E.2d 465

Carol S. STRICKLAND, Appellant/Respondent,

v.

Krom STRICKLAND, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 26375.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard May 1, 2007.

Decided August 27, 2007.

S. Bryan Doby, of Jennings & Jennings, of Bishopville, for Appellant/Respondent.

Paul M. Fata, of Stuckey, Fata & Segars, of Bishopville, for Respondent/Appellant.

Chief Justice TOAL.

This case began as an action to enforce an alimony award. The family court dismissed the claim finding it was barred by the doctrine of laches. We affirm, but modify the family court's decision and we additionally vacate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Hallums v. HallumsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API