Legal Opinion

United States v. Satuloff Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 2, 1935No. Nos. 106, 107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The indictment, in one count, charged appellants with violation of section 1 of the Elkins Act, as amended by Act June 29, 1906, § 2 (U. S. C. title 49, § 41 (1), 49 USCA § 41 (1), in that each appellant unlawfully and knowingly solicited a rebale and concession in the sum of $896.19 from the Wabash Railway Company by means of a device, to wit, a false claim for the loss of part of a carload of turkeys while in transportation in interstate commerce, to the corporate appellant. The basis of the appellee’s claim is that the corporate appellant, through the individual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. The People v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. State v. HoeffelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. StullDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API