Legal Opinion
Jamison v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1991No. 89-399, 89-488PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellants Lemuel Kenley and Dina Jam-ison were occupants 1 of a two-story row house in which quantities of cocaine, with an estimated street value of $3,000, and related drug packaging paraphernalia were seized pursuant to a search warrant. 2 In a joint jury trial, each was convicted on one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. Id. § 33-603(a). 3
The principal trial errors asserted on appeal are: 1) the government’s introduction into evidence of Jamison’s withdrawal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GrazianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- District of Columbia v. Kora & Williams Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Winfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Belton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.