Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Williams and William Scott Hames

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 31, 1995No. 92-9253PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Richard Williams was convicted on both counts of a two count indictment for knowingly conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana and attempted possession with the intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. William Scott Hames was convicted on the second count only. Both defendants appeal their convictions. Hames appeals his sentence as outside the Guidelines and in contravention of the Guideline’s statutory mandate. The Government cross-appeals the district court’s failure to consider Williams’ prior conviction in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Wallace David EleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. James Willis Saget, Julius Phillip Hall, Herbert Nathaniel Johnson, Lamar RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. LuckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Corry ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Cortez CooperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Vadas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Michael Francis DiFalcoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API