Legal Opinion

United States v. James Willis Saget, Julius Phillip Hall, Herbert Nathaniel Johnson, Lamar Roberson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 26, 1993No. 91-9098PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

Appellants were tried and convicted by a jury on charges stemming from a fifteen-count indictment handed down by a grand jury. Appellants raise numerous issues on appeal, including insufficiency of the evidence, erroneous evidentiary rulings, and improper sentencing. We find these contentions to be without merit and AFFIRM the convictions of each appellant on all counts.

I. BACKGROUND

A grand jury returned a fifteen-count indictment against James Willis Saget, Julius Phillip Hall, Herbert Nathaniel Johnson, Lamar Roberson and two other defendants who are not a party…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Walker v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Mario R. Garcia-Emanuel, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Michael BarileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API