Legal Opinion

Keagy v. the Wellington National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1902PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kay County; before Bay ard’T. Earner, Trial Judge

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the- court by

Burford, C. J.:

This is an action brought in-the dis trict court of Kay county in this territory by the Wellington National bank of Wellington, Kansas, on the 14th day of June, A. D., 1898, against M. B. Keagy, the plaintiff in error, to recover upon a note made by Keagy to the bank on January 14, 1889, for the sum of $1,200, payable thirty days after date, with ten per cent interest from maturity.

The plaintiff to take the case out of the statute of limitations, pleaded payments of interest; also that Keagy, before the expiration of five years after the maturity of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Keith v. StetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Harvey v. OsbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Richardson v. MacKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  5. Pears v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Snyder v. MarkenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Parks v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Smith v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API