Legal Opinion
Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1931No. 4493PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
These are two motions for commissions to take testimony abroad.
Three sets of motion papers were served, to wit, those dated December 24, 1930, which were replaced by those dated December 26, 1930, and those dated January 6, 1931.
The motion dated December 26, 1930, is for an order directing the issuance of a commission herein to H. J. Passtoors, of Vest-ijk 47, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, to take the testimony of Gilíes Holst, of the research department, Jan Hendrik Abbink, of the research department, and Nicolaas Anthoni Voorhoeve, of the patent department of N. V.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Standard Cartridge Co. v. Peters Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Welsbach Light Co. v. American Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Minneapolis Harvester WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- SMIMADZU v. Electric Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936