Legal Opinion

Schlarb v. Castaing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1908No. 7332PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered September 20, 1907, upon findings in favor of the defendants, upon granting a nonsuit, after a trial on the merits, dismissing an action for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action for the partition of real property. The facts out of which the controversy arises are, in substance, these: On September 24, 1892, William A. Freeman and his wife, Belle Freeman, being then the owners of the property in question, mortgaged the same to Robert Maynard to secure the repayment, with interest, of a loan of $1,500, made to them by Maynard. Mr. Freeman died intestate on February 2, 1894, leaving as his heirs at law two daughters and two sons, children of himself and Belle Freeman. Mrs. Freeman was shortly thereafter appointed administratrix of his estate. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Cox v. TompkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. McCullochWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Morales Vda. de Rovira v. Cabrera Vda. de SalazarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  3. Rohne v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hallgren Co. v. Correl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Morales de Rovira v. Cabrera de SalazarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API