Legal Opinion

Aune v. B-Y Water District

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1993No. 18102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Steven and Karen Auné (Aúnes) appeal a summary judgment for B-Y Water District (the District) in their action against the Distinct for unjust enrichment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm.

FACTS

It is important to resolution of this matter to recognize the existence of two separate judgments involved in this appeal. On December 2, 1988, Taboi' Plumbing and Electric (Tabor), a party uninvolved in the instant case, obtained a judgment against Aúnes in the amount of $1,614.06. Tabor’s judgment was related to the costs of some services it had provided in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Aune v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Janssen v. TushaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Wentzel v. HuebnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wasserburger v. Consolidated Management Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. Cheyenne Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gesinger v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jacobson v. LeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hasse v. Fraternal Order of Eagles 2421 of VermillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Aune v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API