Legal Opinion

Aune v. B-Y Water District

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1990No. 16707PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice

(On reassignment).

B-Y appeals from a $12,000 jury verdict in favor of Aune claiming sovereign immunity applies because it is an agency or subdivision of the státe.

*2 Facts

Steven and Karen Aune (Aune) purchased land in rural Yankton County in 1984. Two years before Aune bought his land, his predecessor discontinued her membership in the B-Y Water District (BY) which supplied water to the property. When Aune attempted to get the water turned back on, B-Y refused unless Aune paid the accrued monthly minimum charges of $1400 for the two years the water had been off. After several attempts to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Perkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Mattson v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HoganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ritter v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gabriel v. BaumanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Aune v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lp6 v. S.D. Dept of TourismSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API