Legal Opinion

State v. Maidwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2002No. 27824PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal challenging the dismissal of a misdemeanor charge of unlawful possession of wildlife on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. We reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.

*425I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1996, the defendant Frank Maidwell obtained a permit to hunt for antlerless elk, which is defined as either a cow elk or a bull elk with antlers less than six inches in length. On November 3, 1996, an officer from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game contacted Maidwell after receiving information that Maidwell had killed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lopez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Humberger v. HumbergerIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. Barlow's, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. ZunigaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. Gooding CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API