Legal Opinion
Plax Corp. v. Precision Extruders, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 20, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 22-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This is an action for the alleged infringement of claims in Patents No. 2,-128,239 (’239 patent) and No. 2,230,188 (’188 patent). The ’239 patent was applied for February 25, 1933, and issued August 30, 1938, to Enoch T. Ferngren, assignor to Plax; the ’188 patent was applied for March 29, 1938, and issued January 28, 1941, to Ferngren, assignor by mesne assignments to Plax. Since the commencement of this action the defendant, Precision Extruders, Inc., has been dissolved and its assets were transferred to Lamex Chemical Corporation, which has been added as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plax Corp. v. Precision Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Plax Corp. v. Flexcel Container Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
- Plax Corporation v. Precision Extruders, Inc. And Lamex Chemical Corporation. Plax Corporation v. Precision Extruders, Inc. And Lamex Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957