Legal Opinion
Plax Corp. v. Precision Extruders, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 3, 1957No. Nos. 11891, 11892PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Plax Corporation, instituted suit alleging infringement by the defendant, Precision Extruders, Inc., of Ferngren United States Patent No. 2,-128, 239 (’239) and Femgren United States Patent No. 2,230,188 (’188). Subsequent to the filing of the complaint Precision was dissolved and its successor, the other defendant, Lamex Chemical Corporation, was made a defendant. -At pre-trial it was stipulated that the litigation would be limited to the adjudication of tho validity and infringement of •claims 8, 21 and 26 of ’239, and of claim 16 of T88. The claims in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- R. M. Palmer Company v. Luden's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phillips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- Plax Corp. v. Flexcel Container Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
- Plax Corporation v. Precision Extruders, Inc. And Lamex Chemical Corporation. Plax Corporation v. Precision Extruders, Inc. And Lamex Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957