Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. Garfield Heights Municipal Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-1375PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

In his propositions of law, Jones asserts that the court of appeals erred in sua sponte dismissing his complaint for a writ of prohibition. Although *448sua sponte dismissal of a complaint without notice is generally inappropriate, it is warranted if the complaint is frivolous or the claimant obviously cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint. State ex rel. Cossett v. State Governors Federalism Summit (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 1416, 655 N.E.2d 737. To be entitled to a writ of prohibition, Jones had to establish (1) that the municipal court is about to exercise judicial power, (2) that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Cossett v. Executive State Governors Federalism SummitOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Kaylor v. BrueningOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull County Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. Garfield Hts. Mun. CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Westlake v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API