State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull County Probate Court
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Oral Argument
Lee requests oral argument “pursuant to the terms and provisions of’ S.Ct. Prac.R. IX(2)(B).
We deny Lee’s request for the following reasons. First, S.CiPrac.R. IX(2) does not mandate that the court order oral argument in this case. S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2)(A) provides that in “an appeal that is not scheduled for oral argument pursuant to Section 1 of this rule, the Supreme Court may order oral argument on the merits either sua sponte or in response to a request by any party.” (Emphasis added.) Second, Lee neither established nor asserted any of the usual factors that might warrant oral…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State ex rel. Ryant Committee v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Toma v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. The Ryant Commt. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- In re Guardianship of LombardoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.