Legal Opinion

Bradford v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1913No. 571PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Suit in. the Court of Claims under the Tucker Act, so-called, to recover the sum of $15,791.92. The petition was dismissed upon demurrer.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Suit in. the Court of Claims under the Tucker Act, so-called, to recover the sum of $15,791.92. The petition was dismissed upon demurrer. The facts, as alleged, are these: Appellant is the owner of tracts of land, each containing 160 acres, in the Parish of Ascension, State of Louisiana, which have been in his possession and ownership since, respectively, the tenth of October, 1898, fourteenth of September, 1901, and the twelfth of December, 1902. The lands at certain times prior to those dates were public lands of the United States and subject to entry under…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

It' will be observed from the allegations of the petition that appellant not only had been convicted of defrauding the Government of certain lands, but that he was charged with.-fraud in regard to the lands which' he relinquished and on account of which he contends a contract arose between him and the Government. This must be regarded *453as an element in the consideration of the case. Appellant was a.convicted wrongdoer in two cases; he was a suspected wrongdoer in the other cases, and from that standpoint the Government dealt with him; and he was a petitioner for a pardon. The pardon was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Basile v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. James L. Bradford, Appt. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Bradford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API