Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hickory Farms

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 23, 2021No. 1:18-cv-06570Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TANISHA C. DAVIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-06570 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland HICKORY FARMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Tanisha Davis brings this employment discrimination action against her former employer, Hickory Farms. Defendant Hickory Farms moves for summary judgment on all of her claims. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [82] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API