Coker v. Armco Drainage & Metal Products Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomlixsoN
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. The Trial Judge awarded compensation but Petitioner, the injured employee, insists that the basis upon which the award was calculated was incorrect and the amount of award insufficient.
There is no question but that there is material evidence to support the finding of the following compensable injury by the Trial Judge:
“While the petitioner was performing the duties of his employment, which included the unloading of box cars, a box car in which petitioner was working over*12turned causing sheet steel contained therein to slip and slide upon and against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kingsport Silk Mills v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Russell v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Phillips v. Diamond Coal Mining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Boggs v. D & L CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Holt v. West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Dunmore v. Brooks Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.