Legal Opinion

Miller v. Detroit Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 40,471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff owns a two-family residence in Detroit on which she gave a mortgage to defendant, and which, for default, was foreclosed by advertisement May 4, 1934. The premises are not used as a homestead. In March, 1935, plaintiff sought relief under the mortgage moratorium statute (Act No. 98, Pub. Acts 1933, as amended by Act No. 20, Pub. Acts 1934 [1st Ex. Sess.], and Act No. 3, Pub. Acts 1935 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1935, § 14444-1 et seq.}), which was granted, and the period of redemption extended to March 1, 1937. On April 12, 1937, on motion, pursuant to amendment of said act, the period of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Tribbett v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bowers v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. McDaniel v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon FoundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Michigan & Vicinity Conference Board v. Enterprise Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API