Pulver v. Union Inv. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota; Wilbur E. Booth, Judge. Action by J. E. Pulver against the Union Investment Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error sued the defendant in error for $36,500 and interest for breach of contract. Upon a -trial to a jury, a verdict for the defendant was returned, upon which judgment was entered, and to reverse this judgment this writ of error is prosecuted. The assignments of error cover 12 pages of printed record; some of them were repetitions, and others without any exceptions allowed at the trial.
We feel justified to call attention to what has been said by the Supreme Court in a number of opinions on this practice. The latest opinion is Chesapeake & Delaware…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- People v. MallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Donovan v. DriscollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Ayers v. MetcalfIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Pierce's Administrator v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Clayton Arpan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- State, Village of New Hope v. Eric DuplessieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Evis Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, Arthur N. Wells v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.