People v. Mallon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The appellant Mallon was charged, jointly with one Foran, with assault with intent to commit robbery upon the person of one John Tieck, and was Convicted as charged. He appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Only two points are urged for a reversal: 1. That the court erred in admitting certain testimony of Crock*514ett and Donovan, witnesses for the prosecution; and 2. That the court erred in giving a certain instruction, which, it is contended, assumed that an assault had been committed.
It is doubtful if the record shows any sufficient objection to that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People V. EstradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. Chin HaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. AyhensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. FossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.