Cackley v. Smith
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Rice District Court. Suit by Smith against Cackley on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, at the April term, 1889. The defendant comes here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
Samuel J. Smith sued William Cackley in the district court of Rice county upon a promissory note for $1,254.90, executed on the 1st day of January, 1884, and due in 12 months after date, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum. The defendant alleged that this note had been merged into a judgment rendered in the court of common pleas of Jackson county, Ohio, in an action brought by the Centerville National Bank, of that county. This bank brought an action against William Cackley and Sarah E. Spriggs, to-have a certain conveyance of some real estate made by Cackley to Spriggs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Durant v. . AbendrothNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Wixom v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Gross v. BunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edwards & Chamberlin Hardware Co. v. PethickMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Limbocker v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Union Central Life Insurance v. Irrigation Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Randerson v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Houdek v. BrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.