Legal Opinion

Randerson v. McKay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1920No. 9614PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by R. H. McKay against Roy S. Randerson and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, in favor of defendant in error and against plaintiffs in error; this action having been commenced on the first day of May, 1916, by defendant in error to recover upon three certain promissory notes in the aggregate sum of $1,070. It is admitted that said notes were made and executed by plaintiffs in error, and these further facts are presented by the record: That on the 26th day of September, 1914, plaintiffs in error made, executed, and delivered to the defendant in error the notes upon which suit is here brought;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Brooklyn v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Blumberg v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Price v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Houdek v. BrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Neely v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Fischer v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API