Legal Opinion

People v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 21, 1972No. Crim. A. No. 35718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DeCRISTOFORO, J.

Benjamin Carl Adler appeals from his misdemeanor convictions under Penal Code section 311.2 for the sale of two obscene *Supp. 27films, the possession of two other obscene motion picture films and the sale of an obscene book. Defendant William J. Rose appeals from his misdemeanor conviction of the same Penal Code section for sale of the same book. Another misdemeanor charge against defendant Rose for sale of obscene films (different from the Adler films) was dismissed upon motion of the People after the jury’s inability to reach a general verdict although having…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Court v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. People v. KuhnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Miranda v. HicksDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API