Legal Opinion
People v. Kuhns
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1976No. Crim. 14439PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
As a result of a certification, hereinafter detailed, the defendants, despite the establishment of the constitutionality of the statutes under which they were convicted (Pen. Code, § 311 1 and § 311.2, subd. (a) 2 ; see Bloom v. Municipal Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 71 [127 Cal.Rptr. 317, 545 P.2d 229]), seek to press alleged errors to reverse their convictions. We hold that there is no merit to their claims of error in the following fields: (1) the manner in which the jurors who convicted them were selected; (2) the contention that the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a)…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Commonwealth v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Major Clients Agency v. DiemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. LesieureSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.