State v. Hassapelis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Nicholas Hassapelis appeals from a judgment entered on his murder conviction, following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Perkins, J.). His sole contention on appeal is that the court erred by allowing the State to read to the jury a transcript of the deposition testimony of medical examiner Dr. Ronald Roy without first determining his unavailability as a witness at the time of trial. Because we conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm the conviction.
On January 5, 1990, Hassapelis was indicted by the Cumberland…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BurdickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- State v. KeysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. BeginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State v. UllringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- State v. WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.