Legal Opinion

State v. Hassapelis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Nicholas Hassapelis appeals from a judgment entered on his murder conviction, following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Perkins, J.). His sole contention on appeal is that the court erred by allowing the State to read to the jury a transcript of the deposition testimony of medical examiner Dr. Ronald Roy without first determining his unavailability as a witness at the time of trial. Because we conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm the conviction.

On January 5, 1990, Hassapelis was indicted by the Cumberland…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BurdickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. State v. KeysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. BeginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. State v. UllringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API