Legal Opinion

Wright v. Herman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 19, 2005No. 05-0324 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Supplement the Complaint;

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to amend and supplement her first amended complaint. Julia Wright (the “plaintiff’), brings this diversity suit against William Herman and Eric May (the “defendants”), seeking damages for alleged injuries arising out of the parties’ business dealings as members of a Virginia limited liability company. The plaintiff moves to amend her complaint to state with greater specificity her alternative theories of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vericorr Packaging, LLC v. Osiris Innovations Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. (PC) Givens v. PalagummiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. In re Dropbox Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. In re Tyco Internat’l MDLDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
  5. In re Tyco Int’l MDL MDDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API