Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roddewig

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 29, 1938No. 4646PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEWEY, District Judge.

This suit came on for hearing in open court at Des Moines, Iowa, on June 20, 1938, before a statutory three-judge court duly assembled, to hear the application for a temporary injunction. By agreement the motion to dismiss was submitted to be determined at the time the court considered the evidence on the merits. Evidence was introduced, arguments had and on June 21, 1938, also by agreement, the suit was submitted to be determined, subject to the motion, as a final hearing.

The court is abidingly convinced that the suit will have. to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monamotor Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. TafoyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Collins v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Woodbine Savings Bank v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimmey v. H. A. Berkheimer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Kerr v. Enoch Pratt Free LibraryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  3. Phipps v. School Dist. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Helms Bakeries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Diginet, Inc. v. Western Union ATS, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API