Investors Collateral Corp. v. Joyce
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The counterclaim and defense alleged that the loan by plaintiff’s assignor to defendants, Joyce, secured by the mortgage under foreclosure, was made pursuant to a usurious agreement. The findings of the learned trial court that usury was not proved, is supported by the record (cf. Rosenstein v. Fox, 150 N. Y. 354, 364; Grannis v. Stevens, 216 N. Y. 583, 591; Carrington Bros. v. Gadsby, 237 App. Div. 195). In an action to foreclose a mortgage the allowance of costs is discretionary (cf. Empire Trust Co. v. Newport Eng. Co., 249 App. Div. 820; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1477). In the *543absence of an award…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rosenstein v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- P. V. Baranowsky Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Van Bel Co. v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 5Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Carrington Bros. v. GadsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schorner v. SchornerNew York Supreme Court · 1985