Legal Opinion

Investors Collateral Corp. v. Joyce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The counterclaim and defense alleged that the loan by plaintiff’s assignor to defendants, Joyce, secured by the mortgage under foreclosure, was made pursuant to a usurious agreement. The findings of the learned trial court that usury was not proved, is supported by the record (cf. Rosenstein v. Fox, 150 N. Y. 354, 364; Grannis v. Stevens, 216 N. Y. 583, 591; Carrington Bros. v. Gadsby, 237 App. Div. 195). In an action to foreclose a mortgage the allowance of costs is discretionary (cf. Empire Trust Co. v. Newport Eng. Co., 249 App. Div. 820; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1477). In the *543absence of an award…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rosenstein v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. P. V. Baranowsky Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Van Bel Co. v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 5Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Carrington Bros. v. GadsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schorner v. SchornerNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API