Legal Opinion

Carrington Bros. v. Gadsby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff brings this action for foreclosure. The answer of defendant Gadsby sets up that there was an agreement on her part to give a mortgage of $3,500, and the plaintiff was to pay and discharge certain other mortgages, and pay tax liens in a sum which did not amount to the face of the mortgage; and that the balance left over was never paid to her. It is difficult to ascertain from the answer whether defendant is setting up a defense of usury or demanding an accounting for the sum unpaid. Perhaps, inconsistently, she is demanding both.

On the trial, proof was lacking as to a definite…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morton v. . ThurberNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. American Home Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Raben v. Overseas Barters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Investors Collateral Corp. v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API