In Re United States Sugar, Corp. Litigation
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DE 143, 145, 146, 147, and 148]
DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss [DE 143, 145, 146, 147, and 148]. I have reviewed the record and am advised in the premises. As Plaintiffs have filed a consolidated response, and various Defendants share common defenses, this Order will decide all five of the Defendants’ motions to dismiss.
1. Background
This case is a class action filed against the United States Sugar Corporation (“U.S. Sugar” or the “Company”) and related…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bacon v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- AML Software, Inc. v. Athena Bitcoin, Inc. d/b/a Athena Bitcoin Global, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026
- Porter v. First Bankshares, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2022
- Vimbol Capital LLC, et al. v. Gils Aubry, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026